I can see myself using this for side projects. Onboarding is clear and fast and task completion is a breeze as well. UI is friendly, except for the FRAMES section on the left, when I create a post: personally I wasn't able to understand what their function is because their imagery seemed unrelated with my post and when I clicked on few of them they seemed to get selected but nothing happened. They must have a function, and I always have a super dummy approach when I try and review new apps so maybe you could try to improve the informational side of what does what. Just my 2 cents, of course.
Personally, I would also add a publish button to post making window/draft, maybe beside PREVIEW. Right now it seems to be only available from the 3 dots on the CONTENT page. It makes perfect sense, don't misunderstand me, but whenever one step can be saved I'd always go for that.
All the above don't affect my rating because it is expected to have terrain for improvement at launch, especially when it comes to UI and documentation.
The issue I have is with AI-powered imagery: that technology is still far away from being usable in apps like this, because the results are awful. Those of Stori AI are not even that bad, but still not viable for branding, in my opinion. Thing is that this is a common problem to all similar apps right now, so I don't feel like it is a flaw of this particular app. My suggestion to anybody offering this kind of tech in an automated way as a feature of their app is to always "sell it" as a beta feature while offering in-app editing tools for real imagery as the selling point, because AI-powered imagery doesn't meet customers' expectations yet.
About AI-powered text, to the contrary, there's really good prompting behind this app, and with a bit of manual editing here and there one can really save time and money. That makes it a worthy app with great potential, to me; one that I will use for some of my side projects, and whose evolution I'll certainly keep an eye on. 👀
Definitely supporting it.
