Do you agree with Linear that it's time to rethink the MVP?
I agree that the MVP is a journey, and not a one-time validation event, and that continuous iteration is necessary to refine the product into a competitive offering in existing markets.
I found the emphasis on using a waitlist strategically to collect targeted feedback from specific tranches of early adopters a solid recommendation.
Given this, it tracks that when you narrow your target audience, you can be more selective and intentional on how you deploy resources. By leveraging deep understanding of specific user needs, you can create significant value compared with the competition.
Is this similar or different to your approach?
Linear Mobile - The portable companion to the Linear system
Move product work forward. No matter where you are.
Linear Mobile is purpose-designed for “away from keyboard” workflows that complement the desktop experience. Stay on top of your most important streams of work and unblock your team whenever necessary.
Linear vs other project planners
I checked out https://linear.app a few weeks ago. It's a very slick looking product. And some folks feel really passionate about Linear. I have heard engineers say: "I would leave my role if my company decided to switch from Linear."Question for those who have extensive experience with Linear: what makes Linear such a great product? Should I seriously consider migrating to Linear? I have used Jira and Asana a bunch. And, honestly, Jira and Asana seem fine. What am I missing?
