Who should be the owner of AI Generated Art?
David Cagigas
7 replies
I mean every piece of art has an owner (so far the painter), but when it comes to ai generated art, should the user be the owner of the paint?
Replies
Iván Arozamena Balbín@ivan_arozamena_balbin1
Edworking
100% Users
Share
Twinr - App Builder
User
Flamme AI - The Couples App
Users. They are the ones providing the critical "input".
User of the software because I think if a carpenter makes a chair using hammer, then he is owner and not the hammer. :p Maybe a weird example.
Edworking
I would go for the users of the software. You pay for a service and the paint is the unique product you were requiring.
The question of AI-generated art ownership sparks a complex debate at the intersection of creativity and technology. I suggest you to check https://mylondonpainter.co.uk/ and learn more interested things about painting. Some argue that the creator of the AI tool should own the art, while others advocate for the person who inputs the parameters and selects the final output. Ultimately, this evolving field requires thoughtful legal and ethical frameworks to navigate the blurred lines of authorship and ensure fair compensation and recognition for all involved parties.