Pixel Perfect vs Fast Launch?

Fast and "good enough", which is usually worse than you think it'd be. Get validation from your MVP first before making anything perfect. As they say, "fuck around and find out". But you can't fuck around if you're trying to be perfect.

Priority should lie in launching quickly and iterate to avoid time waste

When it comes to developing a product, there's often a decision to be made between launching quickly or taking the time to perfect the design. Both approaches have their pros and cons, and which one to choose depends on the specific goals and resources of the product. Launching a product quickly, also known as an MVP (minimum viable product), has some advantages. It lets companies test the market and gather feedback from early users, which can help improve the product over time. It can also save time and resources by avoiding unnecessary features or design elements. However, taking the time to perfect a product's design before launching can ensure a higher quality user experience, which can set the product apart from competitors. It can also reduce the risk of negative reviews or user frustration due to bugs or usability issues. In the end, the decision between a fast launch and a pixel-perfect design depends on what's important for the specific product. If the main goal is to quickly test the market and get feedback, launching quickly may be the best approach. But if the product needs to stand out in a competitive market or requires a high level of polish to meet user expectations, taking the time to perfect the design before launch could be worth it.

I'm surprised no one has mentioned it already, but I'm starting to see the benefits of a somewhat new term - MLP (Minimum Lovable Product). I guess it would fall in the middle between pixel perfect and fast launch, as it's really a combination of launching fast, but also making sure that there is something people would love to use. Then your initial users group might increase from strict early tech adopters (for example), to people who also really loved the design and only then realized they also need the service.

Make it good enough not perfect. Don't let perfection prevent you from launching. You can always release a new version and learn from user feedback

Since often times, launching a product is usually a part of validation. IMO, it's much more important to address the most painful issues that you aim to solve during you launch/website/mvp, than having the perfect design.

Aim for a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) that has a good design, but prioritize launching to get user feedback and iterate quickly.

In my opinion, a quick launch is more important, but the visual component must be at the level, because the first thing the user encounters is the design and how it is implemented, this is the first impression of the user about the product.

From my point of view, pixel-perfect is essential to be implemented at the first stage of art design project. While a fast launch may seem tempting to get the product out to market quickly, it is important not to sacrifice quality and attention to detail in the process.

No matter how much market research you do, there is no substitute for actually being in the market.

It's important to find a balance between speed and quality. A well-designed product will attract more users, but timely launch can help you gain traction. Iterate and improve as you go.

At first, I would have gone with a fast launch since this approach would provide us feedback on the website's functionality and user experience. However, the downside is that the product may not be entirely polished or refined, and it may not meet the user's expectations. So for now I would slightly go for a pixel perfect approach because it ensures that the final product looks exactly as intended and provides a high-quality user experience.