I don't think Threads can truly threaten Twitter.
LingLingFa.Gavin
13 replies
Does everyone remember Damus a few months ago? It was all the rage when it was first released, and everyone jumped on it to play.
But now, in just a few months, it has completely been forgotten, right?
Replies
![Amulya Prasad](https://ph-avatars.imgix.net/5000276/bbf300fb-f095-41c5-9c1f-20432a720aae.jpeg?auto=compress&codec=mozjpeg&cs=strip&auto=format&w=36&h=36&fit=crop)
Amulya Prasad@amulya_prasad
The chaos of Twitter is hard to steal😅 But you'll never know
Share
I'm just happy that Twitter has competition now.
I believe it has the potential to become a formidable competitor in the future. Meta seems to have had a forward-thinking approach when they introduced it as an add-on for Instagram, indicating their focus on future developments and market trends.
You are right.
I highly disagree and wrote a post on why it will take over Twitter. You can read it on LinkedIn. It is based on learnings from @eugenewei's blog post Status as a Service.
And you are extremely right.
I agree with you.
I don't think so either. I don't think this will be the end of Twitter, it's too large & has too many loyal followers with large follower-bases.
I actually wrote a debate on this exact topic - https://debates.db8.com/p/will-m...
Launching soon!
Thing is. you carry over all your insta followers etc. So they can bootstrap the social graph from day 1. No other new SoMe has that leverage.
I see a kind of rhetoric claiming that Threads has reached 100 million users in three days, 200 million users in a week, on par with Twitter, and 500 million users in a month, dominating the market...
This kind of rhetoric is reminiscent of the claims made last February about "completing a game in 1 hour and 22 minutes."
Without saying anything else, let's start by consistently posting and commenting on Threads every day for a month.
Acquiring users for social products is not easy, and even more challenging is retaining them for the long term.