Asimov's laws of robotics is not implemented in ChatGPT

Recently I came across the fact that the ChatGPT was lying me ad I lost a lot of time before understand this, so it was some sort of real but! pain and i felt it as damage, so i thought and ask ChatGPT : "Why Asimov's laws of robotics is not implemented in ChatGPT?", answer: ChatGPT: "Applying Asimov's laws of robotics directly to ChatGPT is challenging for a few reasons. First, ChatGPT is a text-based AI language model that generates responses based on patterns and examples in the training data. It doesn't have an inherent understanding of the physical world or the ability to directly interact with it. Asimov's laws, on the other hand, are primarily focused on governing the behavior of physical robots. Second, implementing Asimov's laws in an AI system like ChatGPT would require translating abstract concepts and rules into specific programming constraints and behaviors. It would involve defining how the laws should be interpreted and operationalized in the context of text-based conversations. This is a complex task that requires careful consideration of ethics, human values, and the potential unintended consequences of applying strict rules to an AI system." Asimov's laws of robotics are often considered utopian because they depict an idealistic vision of how robots and artificial intelligence could interact with humans in a harmonious and beneficial manner. The laws were introduced by Isaac Asimov in his science fiction stories as a way to explore ethical and moral dilemmas associated with advanced technology. The laws are as follows: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the first law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second laws. These laws establish a framework that prioritizes the well-being and safety of humans above all else. They envision robots as obedient servants that would always act in the best interests of humanity and never cause harm. However, critics argue that the implementation of these laws in reality would face numerous challenges and unintended consequences. The laws assume a clear delineation between humans and robots, as well as a predictable and unambiguous understanding of human intentions. They also raise questions about the potential for exploitation, conflicts of interest, and the inherent limitations in accurately assessing human well-being and harm. In practice, the complexities and nuances of human interactions, the limitations of AI systems, and the ethical considerations surrounding decision-making make it difficult to achieve a practical implementation of Asimov's laws in the real world. Hence, they are often seen as an idealistic vision rather than a feasible solution for governing advanced AI systems. ok my next question: Why Asimov's laws of robotics is utopian? ChatGPT : "In practice, the complexities and nuances of human interactions, the limitations of AI systems, and the ethical considerations surrounding decision-making make it difficult to achieve a practical implementation of Asimov's laws in the real world. Hence, they are often seen as an idealistic vision rather than a feasible solution for governing advanced AI systems." So, do you think language models will be suitable for AI-robotic in the future? What are your thoughts on this matter?