data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3463e/3463e5ca2d59673047124552efb81d84315c4395" alt="Product Hunt"
A few days ago I saw some posts here about:
– the number of discussions is decreasing,
– sometimes they are approved later,
– that there is "other community growth" – I don't know what was meant by that and I'm just guessing.
Yes, the conditions have changed – Forums are more moderated and rules are strict, hoping to bring more value and engagement of active (real) users.
https://help.producthunt.com/en/articles/10478791-product-hunt-forum-guidelines
In general:
discussion shouldn't be "egocentric" but should invite to be a part of it (actively discuss)
should bring a value – something to learn, find out
shouldn't be replicable – not something, that can be easily found on the internet
= It should result in quality and genuine discussion with interactions.
I also find it harder to come up with a new topic that is unique while sticking to the rules, but I assume it raises the bar.
How do you perceive this updated Forum format and its new rules?
Just a few quick tips to create discussions that have a chance to be shared:
Ask questions: Opinions, experiences, lessons learned.
React to news, new situations in the world, and discuss current events.
Follow up on other people's forums, referencing their questions that prompted other questions.
Talk about products, their gaps, improvements, and useful use-cases. (That's what product forums are for.)
I support structured, high-value discussions—nobody wants forums filled with spam and self-promotion. But here’s the issue: understanding what qualifies as “valuable.”
Product Hunt’s updated guidelines push for original, engaging, and non-replicable content. Makes sense. But when posts disappear without clear reasoning, it creates confusion.
Where’s the line between sharing insights and self-promotion?
What defines a post as “high-value” in this new system?
Why not offer feedback instead of outright removals?
Stronger moderation is great if paired with transparency. Instead of guessing what works, clearer guidelines and examples could help everyone create better discussions.
At the end of the day, I’d rather post once with impact than ten times into the void.
What do you think?
I am trying to gather tools directly developed for the Product Hunt platform that could possibly help you with the launch. This is what I have gathered so far.
Advanced PH Scrapper – extracting data of launches into the charts
Hunted Space – calendar & stats for upvotes, comments, upvote speed
Launchgrid – something like a database of launches from PH & HN
Launchpedia – kits (PH resources)
Product Hunt favourites – extension for bookmarking
Product Hunt trending – overview of successful launches (ranking)
Product Wars – upvotes, comments, speed stats
If you know more, feel free to share.
As many of you are likely aware, Product Hunt has always been a place for builders, founders, and tech enthusiasts to discover and share what’s new. But as the startup landscape evolves, so does the next generation of Makers.
I’d love to hear your thoughts - how can we make Product Hunt more appealing to first-time founders, students, and emerging Makers? Are there specific challenges they face that we have the chance to address?
Some questions to get your mind thinking:
What are newer Makers looking for in a platform like Product Hunt? Or missing?
Are there specific types of content, discussions, or features that would encourage more participation?
How can we better support those launching their very first product?
If you’re a newer Maker yourself (or recently were), would especially love to hear your perspective!