Claude by Anthropic

Since they launched in EU it has been my default LLM. Especular for coding I fins the results better than ChatGPT.

Great tool that is at the cusp of forming positive habit loops

The accuracy of the responses is high, and I think the UI is excellent. I particularly like the part where the source code is displayed in the right column.

Great product especially around data visualization or complex questions that require data rich answers

3.5 Sonnet is the best LLM for code. Superior for reasoning and doesn't lose the plot!

It is great there are companies out there that could compete with OpenAI, deliver cutting-edge models, and even contribute to their understanding through research.

I've been using Claude for a while now. Even so, I'm still surprised by his capabilities.

Please Anthropic, allow your pro users on your site to be able to choose between Claude2 and Claude2.1! Since Claude2.1 was imposed there, I've had never-met-with-Claude2 issues that have slowed down my workflow... 2 tickets pending. I'm aware this is still a beta version but please be considerate for your paying users on your site to be offered the same choice given to API users: a choice between C2 and C2.1! TQ

This is the only LLM pro subscription I pay for at the moment. I found it by mistake when Open AI limited my usage due quote. It is faster, and its coding abilities are an order of magnitude better than that of GPT-4o. Its weaknesses are that it cannot output an image, and it is unable to browse the web. With some more tweaks, I think this is the greatest competitor to OpenAI.

As a software developer, I've had the opportunity to work with various AI assistants, and I must say that Claude by Anthropic stands out from the crowd. While my opinion may be slightly biased due to my background, I believe Claude deserves a solid 4 out of 5 stars for its impressive capabilities. Claude outperforms other leading AI assistants like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Llama 3.1 in several key areas . Its human-like responses and exceptional coding capabilities are particularly noteworthy . The way Claude understands context and generates code is truly remarkable. However, there are a couple of areas where Claude could improve. The pricing of its API can be a limitation for developers who want to use it extensively for coding purposes . This may hinder its widespread adoption in the programming community. Additionally, while Claude's context window of 200k tokens is substantial, it's worth noting that Gemini can handle up to 2M tokens , which could be advantageous in certain scenarios. While there is room for improvement in terms of pricing and token capacity, its overall performance and ethical standards make it a strong contender in the market. I'm excited to see how Anthropic continues to enhance Claude's capabilities in the future.