So far, I am not that impressed with any of the AI tools. The tools themselves are not to blame. It's the attitude of the users. The copy, at least from the examples I've seen so far, is only passable. It's a good place to start so long as you don't assume that no human intervention and editing will be required.
What I have been impressed with lately is the improvements in Google Translate. You used to encounter a lot of awkward phrases, and you could tell right away that the page had been translated. But just this week, I've been on sites originally in Korean, Japanese, and German, and the English translations were nearly perfect.
@mike_webster1 I had the same experience. I wrote about testing a bunch of different AI writing tools here. https://mythicalai.substack.com/...
What I found is they can assemble information, but they don't have a voice, they are not concise, and sometimes the info is just wrong.
I believe AI writers are going to be like spell check. Helpful, but they won't make someone an amazing writer.