Subscribe
Sign in
Conservative or Aggressive Expansion?
It contrasts a cautious approach to growing a business, focusing on steady and manageable growth (conservative) versus pursuing rapid and potentially risky expansion to capture larger market shares quickly (aggressive).
which is the best?
6
Replies
Best
Cedric Jude Hawthorne
Tough question. I'd say it depends on your resources and risk tolerance. Aggressive expansion can pay off big if you execute well, but a more conservative approach is safer and steadier. Personally, I prefer controlled, strategic growth over betting the farm on hypergrowth. But for the right company at the right time, going big and bold could be the way to go. Curious to hear others' take on this.
Report
Share
First, stabilize things in a conservative mode, then go aggressive, chase the competition, acquire new opportunities, grow user base, scale operations and business. In short, follow the principles of "fail-fast" and "continuous delivery" models.
Aggressive expansion is actually incredibly difficult to pull off, but if it's possible, it's probably the best approach.
Depends on your specific situation, but in general I'd say start conservatively and ramp up spending once you've found solid product-market fit and have good unit economics. Burning too much cash too quickly is a recipe for disaster if you haven't nailed those fundamentals yet. Focus first on building something people love and will pay for, then pour gas on the fire once you know you've got a winner on your hands.